Here are some things you should keep in mind about this document. The video below makes some good point and also the fact that the document itself is very notable. Why do I say this?
With regard to the Clinton investigation it is clear the Bureau and the Department read elements into the gross negligence statute, which plainly do not exist in the text of the statute. To be more precise, investigators read into the statute a higher level of scienter(legal term for intent/knowledge of wrongdoing), coupled with knowledge and intent; although the investigators could never clearly describe what that particular intent was supposed to be. Equally troubling, there is little to no evidence investigators made any effort to identify evidence that could have addressed the very elements they believed were missing. There is no indication those questions were even asked of witnesses that would have potentially had access to the Secretary's state of mind and no evidence she herself was asked to address questions centered on consciousness of guilt and criminal intent.
So Comey….said Hillary lacked intent….and also didn't investigate her about the intent…
And for those of you that may be interested, you may also find this video helpful.